tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3352121158026308384.post5539262560203005595..comments2023-05-06T19:12:55.104+02:00Comments on The Mac pinball history: Timeshock betaVasilis Grammaticoshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06942584702198342388noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3352121158026308384.post-86892823007585731442015-12-02T21:35:58.129+01:002015-12-02T21:35:58.129+01:00You know what? I'm a little concerned consider...You know what? I'm a little concerned considering all that time and work, and what do you have? A native OSX Timeshock. The screenshot you provided seemed a whole lot like the original, so I booted up Timeshock in Dosbox (mega or something - with the option for millions of colors) and, frankly, if the game plays even as smooth as the dosbox version I don't see ANY difference . The original plays perfectly, as you well know, and the table looks identical. to me, after examining the pictures closely. With the millions of colors option enabled I am concerned there is simply no difference. The 2D table surface seems identical, the 3D bumpers seem identical , and on OSX running via dosbox it is already perfect. I hope there is some real means where all the work and investment in the new Timeshock is justified.<br />You know, the one that REALLY could use an upgrade, even if it is near perfect.. is "the Web".<br />I really wouldn't mind a spin on the new timeshock to convince me it really is worth the immense amount of time and effort gone into it...<br />However, I would *seriously* suggest you compare it running on Dosbox vs the new native version..Doccus Rockus Maximushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11946174462883827539noreply@blogger.com